Shopping cart ITEMS
 modern scholarly publishers in the finest tradition
Login Register
Home
Books
Journals
References
A-Z Index
Author Index
For Our Authors
User Area
Shopping Cart
Contact
Electronic Data Center

Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants

 

ISSN for PRINT: 1050-6934

Institutional price:

$1021.00

Issues per year:

6

For Online Access

Best Paper Award Selection - Editorial Board Site

Add subscription to shopping cart

2000, Volume10

Issue 4

  84 pages  

   

click 'Save as...' here to save XML metadata

Issue price - $175.00  

Add to shopping cart

  • Biomechanical Performance of Silicone and Latex External Condom Catheters
  • Robin Williams, M.D.
    Department of Plastic Surgery, Box 800376, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908

    Richard F. Edlich
    Biomedical Engineering and Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Trauma Specialists LLP, Legacy Verify Level I Shock Trauma Center for Pediatrics and Adults, Legacy Emanuel Hospital, Portland, OR, USA

    Trimble Bailey, B.S.
    Department of Plastic Surgery, Box 800376, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908

    Sheryl A. Pine, B.S.N.
    Department of Plastic Surgery, Box 800376, University of Virginia Health Systems, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908-0376

    George T. Rodeheaver, PhD
    Distinguished Research Professor of Plastic Surgery. Plastic Surgery Research Program, University of Virginia Health System, P.O. Box 801351 Charlottesville, VA 22908-1351, USA

    William D. Steers, M.D.
    J. Y. Gillenwater Professor of Urology; Chairman, Department of Urology. University of Virginia Health System P.O. Box 800422 Charlottesville VA 22908


    ABSTRACT

    Standard in vivo biomechanical performance tests and a pilot clinical study of latex external condom catheters (ECCs) and silicone ECCs demonstrated the superior performance of the silicone ECC over that of the latex ECC. The silicone ECC has a self-adhesive that binds more securely to human skin than the self-adhesive of latex ECC. In addition, the moisture vapor transmission through silicone is significantly greater than through latex. The aggressive self-adhesive of the silicone ECC significantly reduced ECC catheter pop-off compared to that of latex ECC. Silicone ECC removal can be facilitated by the application of a warm, wet cloth to the exterior surface of the silicone ECC, which significantly reduces its self-adhesive force. Constant, gentle traction is then applied to the silicone catheter outlet end to achieve atraumatic silicone ECC removal. On the basis of the results of these standardized tests and pilot study, the silicone ECC is recommended for incontinent men without obstructive uropathy.

    Download article, 10 pages

    Article price - $35.00  

    Add to shopping cart

    << Previous article  

    Designed by offsiteteam Designed by offsiteteam Designed by offsiteteam
    Begell House Inc.
    50 Cross Highway,
    Redding, CT 06896
    TEL (203) 938 1300
    FAX (203) 938 1304
    orders@begellhouse.com