Shopping cart ITEMS
 modern scholarly publishers in the finest tradition
Login Register
Home
Books
Journals
References
A-Z Index
Author Index
For Our Authors
User Area
Shopping Cart
Contact
Electronic Data Center

Critical Reviews™ in Immunology

 

ISSN for PRINT: 1040-8401

Institutional price:

$831.00

Issues per year:

6

For Online Access

Best Paper Award Selection - Editorial Board Site

Add subscription to shopping cart

2003, Volume23

Issue 4

  93 pages  

DOI: 10.1615/CritRevImmunol.v23.i4   

click 'Save as...' here to save XML metadata

Issue price - $132.00  

Add to shopping cart

  • Is an Improved Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine Necessary or Feasible?
  • Gregory J. Atkins
    Virus Group, Moyne Institute, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

    S. Louise Cosby
    Department of Microbiology, Whitla Medical Building, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland, UK


    ABSTRACT

    The measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine has been very effective in the elimination of disease and has high biosafety. However, it has been associated with several adverse effects and has recently caused controversy with regard to its possible association with inflammatory bowel disease and autism. This has been postulated to be a property of the measles component of the vaccine, and a "new variant" autism has recently been described and suggested to be associated with vaccine virus. Although one study has reported the presence of measles RNA in inflammatory bowel disease associated with autism, this has not been independently confirmed. This and most of the other demonstrated or perceived adverse effects of the MMR vaccine could theoretically be ascribed to its composition as a mixture of three live replicating viruses, one of which (measles) can induce immunosuppression, although this hypothesis is speculative. It may nonetheless be desirable to improve the biosafety of the MMR vaccine by the development of a nonreplicating vaccine that will stimulate efficient immunity and protection. DNA vaccines for measles, mumps, and rubella viruses have been constructed and tested in animal models but are poorly immunogenic. Several other prototype candidate vaccines are possible, including those based on the rubella virus component of the vaccine as a vector.

    DOI: 10.1615/CritRevImmunol.v23.i4.40

    Download article, 16 pages

    Article price - $35.00  

    Add to shopping cart

    << Previous article  

    Designed by offsiteteam Designed by offsiteteam Designed by offsiteteam
    Begell House Inc.
    50 Cross Highway,
    Redding, CT 06896
    TEL (203) 938 1300
    FAX (203) 938 1304
    orders@begellhouse.com