Shopping cart ITEMS
 modern scholarly publishers in the finest tradition
Login Register
Home
Books
Journals
References
A-Z Index
Author Index
For Our Authors
User Area
Shopping Cart
Contact
Electronic Data Center

International Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering

 

ISSN for PRINT: 1543-1649

Institutional price:

$747.00

Issues per year:

6

For Online Access

Best Paper Award Selection - Editorial Board Site

Add subscription to shopping cart

2003, Volume1

Issue 2&3

  187 pages  

DOI: 10.1615/IntJMultCompEng.v1.i23   

click 'Save as...' here to save XML metadata

Issue price - $356.00  

Add to shopping cart

  • Treatment of Constraints in Complex Multibody Systems. Part I: Methods of Constrained Dynamics
  • Taira Ozaki
    Construction Equipment Technical Center 1, Development Division, Komatsu Ltd., Osaka, Japan

    Ahmed A. Shabana
    Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA


    ABSTRACT

    The objective of this investigation is to discuss the use of several nonlinear dynamic formulations for modeling constraints in large-scale multibody systems in general, and tracked vehicles in particular. Among the formulations discussed in this article are the augmented method, the nonpartitioning augmented method, the recursive method, and the penalty method. In the augmented formulation, the vehicle kinematic constraints that describe mechanical joints and specified motion trajectories are augmented to the system dynamic equations using the technique of Lagrange multipliers. A Newton–Raphson algorithm and a coordinate partitioning scheme are used to ensure that the kinematic constraint equations are satisfied at the position level. In the nonpartitioning augmented formulation, no check is made to satisfy the kinematic constraint equations and, as a consequence, no coordinate partitioning is required. In the recursive formulation, the system kinematic equations are expressed in terms of the joint degrees of freedom. This formulation allows for modeling spherical, revolute, prismatic, and cylindrical joints. Using this formulation, closed loop chains are modeled using the recursive joint formulation, and cuts are made at selected secondary joints in order to avoid the singular configurations. In the penalty formulation, mechanical joints are modeled using elastic force elements that have assumed stiffness and damping coefficients. These above-mentioned four formulations are discussed in this article. Results of the computer simulations of a large-scale bulldozer model are presented in Part II of this two-part article.

    DOI: 10.1615/IntJMultCompEng.v1.i23.80

    Download article, 18 pages

    Article price - $35.00  

    Add to shopping cart

    << Previous article   Next article >>

    Designed by offsiteteam Designed by offsiteteam Designed by offsiteteam
    Begell House Inc.
    50 Cross Highway,
    Redding, CT 06896
    TEL (203) 938 1300
    FAX (203) 938 1304
    orders@begellhouse.com