|
|
|
Impact factor: 0.494
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISSN: 1044-5110 Print
|
|
|
|
| |
You can order a single issue or an individual article, as well as view the table of contents or article abstract by clicking on the volume number, then the issue number in the right sidebar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Institutional price: $1296.00
|
|
Online subscription
|
|
DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.v17.i6
Pages: 100
|
DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.v17.i6.10
|
Article price - $35.00 |
 |
DROP/WALL INTERACTION CRITERIA AND THEIR APPLICATIONS IN DIESEL SPRAY MODELING
Song-Charng Kong
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Iowa State University, 3028 Black Engineering Building, Ames, IA 50011
ABSTRACT
Drop/wall interaction studies are reviewed with emphasis on diesel spray modeling applications. The wall temperature and drop Weber number have major influences on the outcome of drop/wall interactions. It is known that the drop will rebound with a near-spherical shape once the wall temperature exceeds the Leidenfrost temperature due to a vapor blanket that forms between the liquid drop and the wall. The Leidenfrost temperature increases significantly as the ambient pressure increases. The in-cylinder pressure already exceeds the critical pressure of the fuel drop at the time of injection such that the critical temperature of a fuel drop is a better indication of its wall-wetting possibility. It is unlikely that the surface temperature will exceed either the Leidenfrost temperature or the critical temperature under diesel engine conditions. Thus, the liquid drop will at least be in partial contact with the surface and a fuel film is likely to form. However, the amount of wall film will be less than that observed from single drop/wall impingement experiments due to the interaction of the flattened liquid drops that generates splashing droplets from the wall. On the other hand, nucleate boiling may not occur due to the high in-cylinder pressure that prevents bubbles from nucleating and escaping from the liquid despite the high piston surface temperature. Various splashing criteria are compared and a critical splashing limit is proposed that relates the drop Weber number and Reynolds number to the surface roughness and the existing film thickness. Due to the interactions of fuel drops at the impact site that result in more splashing droplets and less fuel film, previously developed drop/wall interaction models that do not emphasize the formation of wall films can still perform reasonably well in diesel spray modeling.
pages 473-499
|
|
Volume 20, 2010 Volume 19, 2009 Volume 18, 2008 Volume 17, 2007 Volume 16, 2006 Volume 15, 2005 Volume 14, 2004 Volume 13, 2003 Volume 12, 2002 Volume 11, 2001 Volume 10, 2000 Volume 9, 1999 Volume 8, 1998 Volume 7, 1997 Volume 6, 1996 Volume 5, 1995 Volume 4, 1994 Volume 3, 1993 Volume 2, 1992 Volume 1, 1991
|
|
|
|
|
|