Shopping cart ITEMS
 modern scholarly publishers in the finest tradition
Login Register
Home
Books
Journals
References
A-Z Index
Author Index
For Our Authors
User Area
Shopping Cart
Contact
Electronic Data Center

Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

 

ISSN for PRINT: 0896-2960

Institutional price:

$684.00

Issues per year:

4

For Online Access

Best Paper Award Selection - Editorial Board Site

Add subscription to shopping cart

2004, Volume16

Issue 4

  102 pages  

DOI: 10.1615/CritRevPhysRehabilMed.v16.i4   

click 'Save as...' here to save XML metadata

Issue price - $163.00  

Add to shopping cart

  • Hand Splints in Rehabilitation
  • Tatjana Paternostro-Sluga, MD, PhD
    Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Vienna, General Hospital, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A 1090 Vienna, Austria

    Martina Stieger, MD
    Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Vienna, General Hospital, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A 1090 Vienna, Austria


    ABSTRACT

    Hand splinting in rehabilitation has a long tradition and represents a well-established clinical treatment method. There are various therapeutic goals in hand splinting, from immobilization to functional improvement. Pathological conditions that frequently require splint treatment as a part of their rehabilitation management are rheumatoid arthritis (RA), osteoarthritis, tendinopathies, neurological diseases, and burn injuries. Moreover, splint treatment plays an important role in the aftercare of hand surgery. Scientific evidence is poor. There are a number of studies about RA demonstrating that working wrist splints do not have a detrimental effect on grip strength, but no beneficial effects can be statistically proven. The studies concerning splint treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) report evidence for significant short-term relief from clinical symptoms. Following stroke there is insufficient evidence to support or refute the effectiveness of hand splinting. The lack of clinical evidence is in contrast to the widespread clinical use. It is our hope that this review article will encourage physicians and therapists to conduct randomized, controlled clinical trials to broaden the scope of available evidence of the efficacy of this treatment method.

    DOI: 10.1615/CritRevPhysRehabilMed.v16.i4.10

    Download article, 24 pages

    Article price - $35.00  

    Add to shopping cart

      Next article >>

    Designed by offsiteteam Designed by offsiteteam Designed by offsiteteam
    Begell House Inc.
    50 Cross Highway,
    Redding, CT 06896
    TEL (203) 938 1300
    FAX (203) 938 1304
    orders@begellhouse.com