Shopping cart ITEMS
 modern scholarly publishers in the finest tradition
Login Register
Home
Books
Journals
References
A-Z Index
Author Index
For Our Authors
User Area
Shopping Cart
Contact
Electronic Data Center

ICHMT DIGITAL LIBRARY ONLINE

 

ISSN 961-91393-0-5

Individual price:

$246.00 (Must be sent to your home address)
You can order single issue or individual article. To purchase a single issue or an individual article as well as to view tables of contents and abstracts click on issue number.

Institutional price:

$518.00

Volumes per year:

various

For Online Access


Year 1997

• 1CHT'97 - Advances in Computational Heat Transfer
Proceedings of International Symposium - Cesme, Turkey, May 26-30, 1997
    

  733 pages  

   

Volume price - $130.00  

Add to shopping cart

  • EFFICIENT NUMERICAL CALCULATION OF UNSTEADY FREE CONVECTION
  • Graham de Vahl Davis
    University of NSW, Sydney, Australia

    Eddie Leonardi
    Computational Fluid Dynamics Research Laboratory, School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia 2052

    Victoria Timchenko
    University of New South Wales

    Micha Wolfshtein
    Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Technion - Israel Institute of technology, Haifa, Israel


    ABSTRACT

    The solution of Poisson equations is an important ingredient of most methods for the solution of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. In this paper we report on an empirical study of three traditional methods, namely the Successive Over Relaxation (SOR), the Alternating Directions Implicit (ADI) and the Conjugate-Gradients (CG) methods. The boundary conditions considered are typical to vorticity-vector potential methods, and the discretization is by second order central differences on a Cartesian homogeneous mesh. An over-relaxation parameter for the SOR method and a time step have to be determined. However, such parameters do not depend on the solution, only on the matrix to be inverted. Therefore they can be determined empirically for a given matrix. This makes these methods attractive for time dependent problems. In this paper this is done by trial and error. The results show that these three conventional methods can be used efficiently for such problems. It is also seen that the ADI method is superior to the other two, both in processor time and in number of iterations. Moreover, it appears that the ADI method does not need more time steps for larger meshes, while the two other methods require more iterations or time steps.



    Download article

    Article price - $35.00  

    Add to shopping cart

    << Previous article   Next article >>

    Designed by offsiteteam Designed by offsiteteam Designed by offsiteteam
    Begell House Inc.
    50 Cross Highway,
    Redding, CT 06896
    TEL (203) 938 1300
    FAX (203) 938 1304
    orders@begellhouse.com